It seems the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has made another honest
mistake. I say "honest," because I assume the folks down in Washington, D.C., who head up the Kennedy Center are well educated and cultured. How else can one explain the decision by an organization of this national standing to repeatedly ignore jazz and jazz musicians when handing out its most prestigious annual award?
Upon opening the newspaper over the weekend, I was
dismayed to read that once again, not one jazz artist was among the six individuals who were awarded the Kennedy Center's Honors for lifetime achievement in the performing arts. Instead, ribbons and medals adorned the necks of Barbra Streisand, Morgan Freeman, George Jones, Twyla Tharp, Pete Townshend and Roger Daltrey.
Even more appalling than the absence of, say, Sonny Rollins, Benny Golson, Hank Jones or Dave Brubeck, were the names of some of those actually being celebrated.
Two of the six honorees were British hard rockers whose greatest contribution to performance art included destroying instruments on stage, a rock opera trashing the disabled, and songs honoring acid trips. What's more, one of the two British honorees was arrested in 2003 on child pornography charges, which were later dropped though his name was added to a list of sex offenders.
Here's part of the Associated Press story from 2003:
"Rock guitarist Pete Townshend, co-founder of
The Who, was cleared Wednesday of possessing pornographic images of children but still was placed on a national register of sex offenders.
"That registration was part of a formal police caution Townshend received for accessing a Web site containing images of child abuse.
"Townshend was arrested in January on suspicion of making and possessing indecent images of children. The arrest was part of Operation Ore, an FBI-led crackdown on Internet child pornography.
"After a four-month investigation, London's Metropolitan Police said Wednesday the rocker 'was not in possession of any downloaded child abuse images' but had accessed a site containing such images in 1999.
"The musician acknowledged using his credit card to enter a Web site advertising child pornography but said he was doing research for his autobiography."
Whatever. Look, like every 1970s teen, I grew up with The Who's Baba O'Riley blasting away on FM car radios. I even
own the group's CDs, and there's certainly something to be said for their synth-driven influence on rock as well as their energy and craft. All that notwithstanding, it's a cultural outrage to award Daltrey and Townshend this country's most esteemed cultural award over jazz artists who truly deserve it.
The last pure jazz artist to win a Kennedy Center Honors award was
Benny Carter in 1996. (Quincy Jones in 2001 doesn't really count, since he straddles so many forms of music). Hence, it has been 12 years since jazz was truly honored, complete with a taped stage tribute that's aired on national television over the holidays.
So how are honorees selected? Each year the Kennedy Center's national artists committee and past honorees present recommendations for proposed honorees to the center's board of trustees.
No matter how you cut it, the oversight is appalling. Does the Kennedy Center fear that jazz artists will somehow embarrass the institution? Do jazz musicians not qualify
because their record sales aren't high enough? Or is it simply that jazz musicians haven't been clever enough to muster beltway muscle to lobby committee members on their behalf? It's very nice that the Kennedy Center holds tributes to jazz artists from time to time and invites jazz legends to play on its modern stage. The bigger question is why jazz artists aren't taken seriously and honored with the same pomp as the six who appeared in newspapers over the weekend.
The mistaken belief that jazz somehow is an angry art form played by cynical, mercurial outcasts is a stereotype that continues to linger—even though the two British
musicians honored days ago made careers out of that very behavior. Jazz is a humble, improvisational art that best represents freedom and remains this country's greatest music export and asset. Throughout the 1950s, jazz and jazz musicians were repeatedly asked by the State Department to represent American art, values and democracy abroad. Jazz musicians gladly filled this role and succeeded beyond expectations. To this day, you can't go to Europe, Asia or Latin America without hearing stories from older fans about the day Louis Armstrong or Dave Brubeck came to town to perform.
Daltrey and Townshend may merit being in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (The Who was
inducted in 1990), but they are hardly more significant to the performing arts than a long list of living jazz greats. Didn't Sonny Rollins record enough great music? Didn't Benny Golson [pictured] write enough jazz standards? And didn't Hank Jones play on enough critical record dates? Hasn't jazz done enough to make America proud at home and abroad, and hasn't it contributed mightily to the country's image?
Clearly performing brilliant music decade after decade right off the top of your head isn't genius
enough. After a presidential campaign in which "pork," "influence peddling" and "business as usual" were excoriated, handing out awards the old fashioned way seems out of touch. I suppose it's jazz's own fault. What jazz artists need to do is collectively hire a firm of Washington lobbyists to wine and dine the Kennedy Center powers.
Ultimately, the Kennedy Center should be ashamed of itself. The good news is that President-elect Barack Obama over the
weekend said that he would make the First Family's home the "people's house" and open it up for science seminars, kids groups and music—specifically classical and jazz. It also was encouraging a few weeks ago to hear Quincy Jones on the radio saying that he had spoken to President-elect Obama about giving jazz a bigger voice, and that the soon-to-be Commander in Chief had agreed with him. [Pictured: Willie "the Lion" Smith and Duke Ellington at the White House in 1969]
So why are the likes of Sonny Rollins, Benny Golson and Hank Jones and so many others worthy of this prize passed over annually for much dimmer artistic lights? Perhaps the answer rests in text on the Kennedy Center's own site:
"The Honors gala is the Kennedy Center's most important annual fund-raising event, supporting its performing arts, education, and outreach programs."
I suppose destroying instruments and celebrating negativity for more than 40 years is conveniently dismissed when the recipients have sold 100 million records. Especially if there's a good shot they may be future donors.


Well said and right on target. The amusing thing -- for ironists like ourselves -- is if the Kennedy Center dismisses jazz artists as having insufficient audience name-recognition, they don't realize that no one under 40 knows Daltrey and Townsend either. Dreck, not cream, rises to the top in these institutional awards. Cheers and thanks! Michael
Posted by: Michael Steinman | December 09, 2008 at 08:19 AM
Well said. And what about Dave Brubeck, who just turned 88 on saturday, Dec 6.
Bruce Ricker
www.rhapsodyfilms.com
Posted by: Bruce Ricker | December 09, 2008 at 11:29 AM
i would say, it's kind of funny i was listening to bab oriley alot the past few days, i read this site everday, i dig all music, especially jazz,
i always thought it was weird how some groups of people get rich and famous for bad imitations of american music, thats marketing, most of the stuff u can tell where it comes from and who was listening to who if u listen, well, when they honor pearl jam next then i'll know this country is going down the tubes, the who can actually play, i used to like their energy, and tommy, if u watch that movie, its pretty much the world right now, at least the western world. great post, i dig this site, with the inteverviews, and man i would like to hear your record collection.
Posted by: tommy | December 09, 2008 at 01:08 PM
i actually saw some clips of the event on the news, and they had the foo fighters, on, at the gala event, now I know this country is going down the tubes!.
Posted by: pinballwizard | December 09, 2008 at 11:04 PM
I agree that jazz doesn't get enough praise anymore - it's more common to overlook this great art form. As a former employee of the Kennedy Center, I will say that the Jazz Department there is doing amazing things despite very little of the operating budget of the institution as a whole going towards jazz. While I interned there, we had two jazz shows in the large concert hall--one of which was Terence Blanchard's show. Around that time he was also seated at the Kennedy Center Honors, and invited to The White House. It might not have been an award, persay, but it certainly was a recognition of his impact.
Lastly, here is a link to my review of a recent concert at the KC titled "D.C. and The Duke" -- the show was a part of a NINE DAY FESTIVAL BY THE KENNEDY CENTER highlighting jazz in the nation's capital.
http://www.jazz.com/jazz-blog/2008/12/3/dc-celebrates-three-jazz-masters
Posted by: David Tenenholtz | December 10, 2008 at 10:17 AM
> I suppose destroying instruments
> and celebrating negativity for
> more than 40 years
Of course, I agree with you entirely about how rotten it is of the Kennedy Center people to have overlooked jazz artists. Cela va sans dire, as they say.
Still, though, I don't think that positive attitude or exemplary behavior should be among the criteria for awards. Should the woman who sang "Strange Fruit" receive a pat on the back for being cheery? It's the music that matters, creating the music and performing the music.
Posted by: chris schneider | December 10, 2008 at 03:56 PM
There may be some very deserving jazz artists who should be honored. However your cheap shots at Pete Townshend by bringing up his past legal troubles do nothing to strengthen your argument and show a serious lack of character.
Posted by: Elaine | December 10, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Honoring jazz musicians shouldn't have to entail trashing musicians in other genres. The sooner we get past this embittered way of thinking, the better.
There's not "something to be said" for Daltrey and Townshend's music. Their music is extraordinary. It has moved millions of people. Should there be a jazz great in the balcony alongside them? Of course. That doesn't mean they're undeserving themselves.
Posted by: David Adler | December 11, 2008 at 11:31 AM
The Kennedy Center awards, as well as the concept and reality of such actual arts complexes themselves, have always seemed to me like meaningless nonsense when not actively dangerous -- in that they (such awards and arts complexes) suck up money and attention that might have gone elsewhere, where some of the real stuff in the arts is happening. See, for example, accounts of how over the last decade the highly priced touring offshoots of Jazz @LC have killed off the ability of many worthwhile "name" jazz artists of high artistic stature to put together regional tours of colleges and performancing arts centers, as they used to be able to do.)
In particular, such awards (as has become the case with newspaper political endorsements) are in effect advertisements for the institutions themselves, a way of signaling to their semi-imaginary would-be constituencies that the institution is "with them" in some respects. That the zombies in control at the KC wouldn't feel that way about jazz any more is hardly news; though if they did ... well what do zombies do when they come in contact with real people?
Posted by: Larry Kart | December 15, 2008 at 11:02 AM
You take a reasonable and even laudatory premise, that jazz is seriously under-represented at the Kennedy Center and elsewhere (such as at our Presdient's inauguration), and then employ a cyclotron to swat flies, including cheap shots at the Who (including buying into the media's feeding frenzy over half-baked allegations from Pete's personal life), let alone the curious notion that a central prmise of the rock opera TOMMY is to mock the disabled. Why is it that a music as compassionate and visonary and inclusive as jazz has to be championed by such embittered and reactionary snobs, and why such intellectually lazy rhetoric must be deployed. We all go through our jazz snobbery phase, but most of us come out. Apparently you never did. Pity.
Posted by: Chip Stern | February 16, 2009 at 01:37 PM
I'm glad to know I wasn't the only one turned off by the shallow, ill-informed and mean-spirited jabs at Pete Townshend and The Who.
Posted by: Ruff | February 18, 2009 at 12:12 AM